This Blog was brought to you by The Bryan A Woods Law Firm: Your Construction Defects Lawyers in San Antonio
Real Estate Fraud Lawyer San Antonio
A real estate fraud lawyer in San Antonio represents home buyers who discover that sellers concealed defects, lied about property conditions, or failed to disclose known problems before sale. Purchasing a home represents a major financial decision, and buyers deserve honest information about what they are buying. A real estate fraud attorney in San Antonio holds dishonest sellers accountable and pursues compensation for buyers who were deceived. Board Certified Attorney Bryan A. Woods has recovered damages for San Antonio buyers victimized by non-disclosing sellers.
San Antonio real estate fraud lawyers see cases involving sellers who hide foundation problems, cover up water damage, conceal mold contamination, and lie about property history. These sellers profit by passing defective properties to unsuspecting buyers who discover problems only after closing. A real estate fraud lawyer in San Antonio investigates what sellers knew, proves they failed to disclose material information, and pursues legal remedies. Bryan A. Woods has extensive experience with real estate fraud and non-disclosure cases.
Texas law requires sellers to disclose known material defects, and common law imposes duties against fraud and misrepresentation. If you purchased a home and discovered undisclosed defects, consulting a real estate fraud attorney in San Antonio helps you understand your legal options.
Seller Disclosure Requirements in Texas
Texas law establishes specific disclosure requirements for residential real estate transactions.
Seller’s Disclosure Notice required under Section 5.008 of the Texas Property Code obligates sellers to disclose known conditions affecting the property. The standard disclosure form asks about foundation problems, roof leaks, plumbing issues, and many other potential defects.
Known-defect disclosure requires sellers to disclose material defects they know about. Sellers need not disclose speculative problems, but they cannot hide known issues.
Exceptions to disclosure include foreclosure sales, transfers between family members, and certain other transactions. Most standard residential sales require disclosure.
Real estate agent duties include honest dealing with all parties. Agents who participate in concealment or misrepresentation may share liability with sellers.
Types of Real Estate Fraud
Seller misconduct supporting fraud claims takes several forms.
Active concealment involves deliberate efforts to hide defects from buyers. Painting over water stains, patching foundation cracks cosmetically, or hiding mold behind new drywall constitutes active concealment.
Fraudulent misrepresentation involves affirmative false statements about property conditions. Claiming the roof is new when it is not, stating there are no foundation problems when they exist, or lying about flooding history constitutes fraud.
Non-disclosure of known defects violates both statutory requirements and common law duties. Sellers who know about problems and fail to disclose them on the required forms commit fraud.
Half-truths that are technically accurate but misleading can constitute fraud. Disclosing some problems while hiding others, or providing incomplete information that creates false impressions, supports fraud claims.
Proving Real Estate Fraud Claims
Successful fraud claims require proving specific elements.
Material misrepresentation or concealment must be proven through evidence of what sellers said, wrote, or hid. Disclosure forms, purchase agreements, and communications provide evidence.
Seller knowledge must be established through evidence that sellers knew about defects before the sale. Prior repair records, contractor complaints, and circumstantial evidence of knowledge support this element.
Buyer reliance on misrepresentations or non-disclosure must be shown. Buyers must demonstrate they would not have purchased or would have paid less with accurate information.
Damages resulting from the fraud must be proven. Repair costs, diminished value, and other losses constitute recoverable damages.
Evidence in Non-Disclosure Cases
Building strong cases against non-disclosing sellers requires gathering evidence of what they knew and when.
Prior repair records showing that the sellers addressed the problems demonstrate their knowledge. Contractor invoices, warranty claims, and repair permits all indicate seller awareness.
Neighbor testimony about problems visible to the neighborhood or discussed with the sellers provides evidentiary value. Neighbors often know about flooding, foundation work, and other significant issues.
Inspection reports from when sellers purchased or from failed sales attempts may reveal known defects. Prior inspections documenting problems prove the seller’s knowledge.
Circumstantial evidence, including fresh paint in water-prone areas, new carpet over damaged flooring, and recent cosmetic repairs, suggests concealment efforts.
Legal Remedies for Real Estate Fraud
Buyers victimized by seller fraud have multiple legal remedies.
Actual damages, including repair costs, diminished property value, and related expenses, are recoverable. The goal is to put buyers in the position they would have occupied with honest disclosure.
DTPA claims may apply when seller conduct constitutes deceptive trade practices. Enhanced damages and attorney fees available under the DTPA strengthen buyer claims.
Fraud damages may include mental anguish in appropriate cases. Discovering you have been defrauded in a major transaction causes real emotional harm.
Rescission, in some cases, allows buyers to undo transactions and recover purchase prices. This remedy is available in limited circumstances.
Statute of Limitations Concerns
Real estate fraud claims have time limitations that make prompt action important.
The discovery rule starts the limitations period when buyers discover, or should have discovered, the fraud, not necessarily at closing. However, this rule does not extend limitations indefinitely.
Four-year limitations generally apply to fraud claims in Texas. Claims must be filed within four years of accrual.
DTPA limitations of two years from discovery apply to Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims.
Contact a San Antonio Real Estate Fraud Attorney Today
If you purchased a home and discovered undisclosed defects, Board Certified Attorney Bryan A. Woods can pursue claims against the sellers who deceived you. Bryan A. Woods has extensive experience with real estate fraud and non-disclosure cases. Call 210-824-3278 to schedule your consultation.
More Great Blogs Here:
https://www.lisascruggsattorney.com/construction-defect-lawsuits-homeowner-vs-developer/
https://www.charlesbfrye.com/architectural-and-design-flaws-in-construction-defect-cases/
https://www.arlingtontexaslegal.com/legal-responsibilities-of-builders-and-contractors/
https://www.collinslawfirm.net/how-to-prove-negligence-in-construction-defect-claims/
https://www.westseegmillerattorneys.com/building-code-violations-and-construction-defect-lawsuits/
https://www.ntanlaw.com/common-types-of-construction-defects-in-texas/
https://www.hinshawlawnews.com/construction-defect-settlements-and-compensation/
https://www.johnrvivianlaw.com/construction-defects-in-commercial-properties/
https://www.svingenlaw.com/construction-defects-in-new-home-construction/
https://www.attorneythomasjbell.com/filing-a-construction-defect-lawsuit-in-san-antonio/
https://www.bailinson-oleary.com/foundation-defects-legal-action-and-compensation/
https://www.legalnews.tv/hiring-a-construction-defect-attorney-what-to-know/